tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post3918373662747515140..comments2023-05-27T08:30:33.650-07:00Comments on DawnWayang.com: Oh no!!! i got found out!!dawn wayanghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05351741303814316000noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-86097894610545233342010-08-22T12:52:42.334-07:002010-08-22T12:52:42.334-07:00Fuck, this EmmZen is a walking idiot. The bias tow...Fuck, this EmmZen is a walking idiot. The bias towards DY is appalling. Stupid dick.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-8085668625444272792009-07-07T01:28:48.892-07:002009-07-07T01:28:48.892-07:00wow i want to see Dawn Yang's photos when she ...wow i want to see Dawn Yang's photos when she was teenager..>.<nancy ishibihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06022850319899622565noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-28152100083473792032008-07-28T10:45:00.000-07:002008-07-28T10:45:00.000-07:00@swdExactly! So I'm assuming likewise it would clo...@swd<BR/>Exactly! So I'm assuming likewise it would close-minded of someone to assume that DY slept with Royston by basing their judgment on pics which they feel were intimate (using their own perception of what intimacy is) rather than on what DY and Royston would consider intimate.<BR/><BR/>As for DY feeling sad. I highly doubt that IF she slept with him, since Royston makes it clear from the very beginning on the only thing he wants (and never gets according to xxvsdy- i would say it's seldom gets rather than never).<BR/><BR/>Malicious photoshopping?? Showing less of Agri's arm is hardly malicious. A perfect example of malicious photoshopping is that bully who "shopped" cum onto XX's pic and tried to pass it off as the real thing.<BR/><BR/>A perfect example of a malicious act is XX creating the hate blog for blinkymummy. Ironically this is one instance of where XX and DY are alike. XX made this act of bullying sound like a trivial one by saying that it was for fun (just like DY saying that she didn't know it was wrong to plagiarise on blogs). <BR/><BR/>The second instance of them being alike is XX asking why her other two friends that co-created the hate-blog were not getting any flak (similar to people saying that DY asks why other people who have done the same things as her are not "targetted"). And XX wonders why people compare them!<BR/><BR/>As for me being DY. I would love to be her just to make you happy. Sadly it isn't so. I don't have much proof other than my post apologising for being MIA happens to be during the time DY was spotted watching a movie (thanks again Stella). Not to mention I emailed DW around the same time telling her about my first blog post as I promised him/her first dibs at reading it.<BR/><BR/>With regards to the single blog post. It took me almost 2 weeks to research and write it and you expect something this soon??? I'm not as free as Stella or DW. Besides I wrote my piece on bullying and need to figure out whats next.<BR/><BR/>Also this can hardly be considered to be trolling since in order to be a troll, what I write has to be off topic, but isn't that what the comments section is for?? To post comments on what readers think??? So how can it be off topic???<BR/><BR/>Finally, name calling again??? Grow up already (unless you're still in pri or sec school).<BR/><BR/>*Disclaimer: This a a drunk-writing post. If anything does not make sense, I'll correct it tomorrow.EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-3584626525110045282008-07-27T21:13:00.000-07:002008-07-27T21:13:00.000-07:00then that someone is extremely close-minded, sorry...then that someone is extremely close-minded, sorry to say. =)<BR/><BR/>okay then, manure. WHAT IF dy slept with mr r? WHAT IF the reason why she denied being in a non-platonic relationship was because he got tired of her? he's "getting fresh" with other babes now. poor dy; must feel so sad that she was used and thrown away... like tissue.<BR/><BR/>xx has come clean on photoshopping and stated in her blog that she does photoshop but to the extent where she cleans up herself and the people around her. did dy do that? by mutilating agri's arm, does that show that she cleaned it up? no, she only loves herself and cleaned up only herself, not bothering about the people around her.<BR/><BR/>hey, could you possibly be dy herself? now with the sudden influx of dy's other nicks, all dy supporters are suspects, you know. and upon checking your blog, you only have one entry and it's about cyber bullying... suspicious.<BR/><BR/>or you could just be a troll. either way, it's bad. =)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-49748616055050357942008-07-27T00:56:00.000-07:002008-07-27T00:56:00.000-07:00@ missy_addieIf DY had gone the police route it wo...@ missy_addie<BR/><BR/>If DY had gone the police route it would have been a case of criminal defamation which is an offence against the state. So if XX lost she would end up with a criminal record.<BR/><BR/>@swd<BR/>Firstly, I am NOT calling XX a SPG. I am saying that someone who looks at her, and sees her with a caucasian, but does not know anything about the relationship might assume that she is a SPG. <BR/><BR/>Like you said, you had to go through her archives to find out. What if I wasn't in a related social circle to XX to know the status of their relationship. So would it be fine for me to assume that she's a SPG if that was the case? Isn't that like how you are assuming that DY slept with Royston even though only they will know if they did or did not sleep together??? <BR/><BR/>Secondly, DY is saying that SOME of the comments were defamatory. She's not saying that all are. For example, can XX prove that she slept with Royston? What about proving that DY did had a boob job? Can XX prove that she copied Arissa? (One again, go read XX's post on what DY is asking for in the apology).<BR/><BR/>Dig my ears??? I read the "transcript" of the show on XXvsDY... who did she blame? All I see are excuses that trivialised something very serious, when she should have just said yes, I'm sorry and not made the excuses. <BR/><BR/>From to the "transcript" on XXvsDY: "i thought since its a personal blog i didn't think we need to cite our sources like we need to do in academic paper or if i was a straits times reporter writing for newspapers.. so.. ya.. i think.. i mean now that people have voiced.. ya..ya..mmm.." (As an added note, I agree wholeheartedly with XX's stance on plagiarism in her latest blog post.) <BR/><BR/>How is photo-shopping her breasts to look bigger malicious??? Does that mean that XX is malicious for photo-shopping her face all the time??? How does it hurt Agri that DY's breast "protrudes" past her arm more than they would have in real life??<BR/><BR/>@anonymous<BR/>If it was a so called "expose" then yes it may not be bullying, BUT trying to humiliate her by repeatedly calling her a whore, insinuating that she would "spread" for any man (and/or woman), etc. If that doesn't fit into the research definition of bullying, I don't know what does.EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-47409163931705035152008-07-27T00:02:00.000-07:002008-07-27T00:02:00.000-07:00Speak about being hypocrites, there is a hypocrite...Speak about being hypocrites, there is a hypocrite in every single person be it conscious or not. it's less compulsive than lying though. and what DY did is beyond comparison of the two. I love reading both DY and XX blogs and DW makes it so much better for the irony on DY. I still dont get how DW is bullying DY because after all, she is famous and every single so-called celebrity needs one or two reality checks every now and then. not to mention juicy gossip and exposes!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-36451274897523360582008-07-26T23:52:00.000-07:002008-07-26T23:52:00.000-07:00@ manureAs for the inference bit... if I didn't al...@ manure<BR/><BR/><I>As for the inference bit... if I didn't already know that XX was in a committed relationship, or that she and Mike have been together for some time, doesn't that mean that I can assume that she's a SPG? Afterall you made the assumption that DY is/was in a non-platonic relationship with Royston based on photos in which IMHO looked like he was trying to get fresh with her (in contrast with you thinking it looked intimate).</I><BR/><BR/>wow, i think you're acting dense on purpose. mr r was trying to get fresh with her? if i were dy and didn't want him to do that, i would've moved away QUICKLY before the person took the pic. but do you know what i think? I THINK DY PURPOSELY LET US THINK THAT SHE AND MR R WERE INTIMATE SO THAT SHE CAN FLAUNT THE FACT THAT SHE HAS A BOYTOY WHO CAN PAY FOR HER GREEDY WANTS AND THEN ACT INNOCENT WHEN CONFRONTED (AS USUAL). and as much as people like you would like to think that all he wants is a chaste kiss in return, most of us believe that she spread her legs for him.<BR/><BR/>secondly, you said that you understood what an spg is. so why are you still accusing xx of being one? i have gone through some of xx's archives and she has mentioned bits on how she and mike met. and it did not even happened in singapore.<BR/><BR/>dude, dy was "woman enough to admit it"? did you dig your ears? SHE BLAMED AS MANY PEOPLE AS SHE COULD ABOUT WHY SHE PLAGARISED. oh, so honest! my ass.<BR/><BR/>i'm extremely amused that you think that xx's comments about dy's looks are defamatory. did you bother going to cozycat's thread about dy? even with xx keeping quiet, others have pulled out inconsistencies in dy's looks INCLUDING a pic with fellow "blogger" agri, where dy maliciously photoshopped her breast to look bigger but in the process mutilated agri's arm. if anything, THAT is malicious intent. so insecure that she had to resort to that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-13040058204025953962008-07-26T18:47:00.000-07:002008-07-26T18:47:00.000-07:00Why would XX have a criminal record?By definition,...Why would XX have a criminal record?<BR/>By definition, a criminal offence is when you commit a crime against the state. In this case, it's Dawn Yang V.S. XiaXue, not the State V.S. XiaXue. <BR/>It's a civil lawsuit, not criminal.<BR/>Civil lawsuit shouldn't leave any criminal record on the defendant.<BR/>Correct me if I was wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-46100890268890606042008-07-26T16:44:00.000-07:002008-07-26T16:44:00.000-07:00@ KarcyCheck out the the working definition of bul...@ Karcy<BR/>Check out the the working definition of bullying and you'll realise that dressing it up as an "anti site" doesn't make it any less of a case of bullying. Likewise, just because the act is less/not intimidating, it doesn't make it less of a bullying as intimidation is only one method of bullying.<BR/><BR/>@swd<BR/>it makes no difference on what DY's personality is as it's irrelevant to my argument.<BR/><BR/>As for the inference bit... if I didn't already know that XX was in a committed relationship, or that she and Mike have been together for some time, doesn't that mean that I can assume that she's a SPG? Afterall you made the assumption that DY is/was in a non-platonic relationship with Royston based on photos in which IMHO looked like he was trying to get fresh with her (in contrast with you thinking it looked intimate).<BR/><BR/>Btw what truth was XX telling??? That DY has breast implants?? I haven't seen anything on that except for that one photo. I wish XX luck on that one point because even if its true, unless she can bring the actual surgeon with the case-notes to court, she's already lost on that.<BR/><BR/>Have a re-read of what XX posted on what DY wanted in the contents of the apology. She is not asking for a blanket apology. She is only asking for XX to apologise for certain statements.<BR/><BR/>I'm sure someone will say or has already said that others have said it already, so why XX. Legally speaking, reproduction of defamatory materials is still defamation. I don't know if you know this but if a journalist makes a defamatory statement, both the publisher and the printing company can also be sued for defamation. I can only assume that only XX has received lawyers letters because of her high readership.<BR/><BR/>I don't think DY is going to be stupid on what she might sue for (It's not suing as yet). Considering her counsel, I think I can safely assume that she's going to pick carefully what to sue for. Mind you, the onus is not on DY to prove it, but for XX to prove the statements that DY picks as defamatory are true.<BR/><BR/>To be frank, I'm kind of glad that DY might be going the sue route for two reasons. Firstly because IMHO XX is malicious and vindictive.<BR/><BR/>Secondly and more importantly because DY did not go the police route . This is because if she won, XX would have a criminal record, and could go to jail. (Yes in good old sunny Singapore defamation is a criminal offence (Sec 499 Cap 224), and in the precedents that I know off, there is a jail term.)<BR/><BR/>P.S. Yes I read about it. If the "transcript" on what she said on 98.7 about it is true, then I'm glad she was woman enough to admit it, BUT I don't think she should have trivialised the matter.EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-92048855557975403182008-07-26T16:35:00.000-07:002008-07-26T16:35:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-90200933773256360992008-07-26T13:28:00.000-07:002008-07-26T13:28:00.000-07:00show pic la . datuksri@gmail.comshow pic la . datuksri@gmail.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-43031578865052705392008-07-26T13:26:00.000-07:002008-07-26T13:26:00.000-07:00@ emmie babyif dy's great grandparents had mixed b...@ emmie baby<BR/><BR/>if dy's great grandparents had mixed blood, it's still diluted and dy is simply hao lian-ing. truth be told, if we could trace our ancestors way to the very first person who created our family tree, we ourselves would have dutch, thai, jap, alien blood also. but do you see anyone boasting abt it like dy does? NO.<BR/><BR/><I>I do know what an SPG is. What I'm inferring is that someone could easily say just that, just like people are saying that DY slept with Mr R from pics of them in public???</I><BR/><BR/>um, hello, i think you fell and smacked your little head on the pavement. dy went out with mr r WHILE claiming that she and him are just friends. ya, staying in the same room and (possibly) sleeping in the same bed + posing quite intimately = just friends. and the sun is blue.<BR/><BR/>xx and mike are in a COMMITTED relationship. they both stay together and have been together for a long time now. GOT DIFFERENCE OKAY.<BR/><BR/>furthermore, mr r is not an angmoh so i don't know how their men can be similar or be compared.<BR/><BR/><I>Btw, if you had read the emails XX posted. DY wanted to settle the matter amicably with just the post taken down and with a sincere apology highlighting what was wrong. Of course XX would not apologise properly, but DY decided to just be nice and forget it (as per her blog). It was XX that decided to launch the next round of attacks so DY retracted her truce offering. What else could DY do other than to seek proper legal action then??</I><BR/><BR/>my darling, you only apologise WHEN YOU HAVE DONE SOMETHING WRONG. does xx think she did anything wrong? no. furthermore, WHY should she apologise when she was TELLING THE TRUTH?<BR/><BR/>the lawsuit only shows that dy is a coward who wants to save her own ass but made her own self look worse because now a lot of her lies are being exposed.<BR/><BR/>also, she was stupid enough to file a lawsuit because of that when xx was all for wanting to put the matter behind her. dy is STUPID for filing the lawsuit because now, the shit has hit the fan. ORH BI QUECK I SAY.<BR/><BR/>dy wants to get butthurt over comments that claim that she had plastic surgery? COME OUT AND ADMIT LAH THEN NO ONE WOULD SAY ANYTHING ELSE.<BR/><BR/>p.s. how the hell did you think the fhm article find out that she had mixed blood? BECAUSE SHE TOLD THEM LAH, STUPID, OF COURSE THEY WOULD POST THAT.<BR/><BR/>p.p.s. since you had an "emergency" to deal with, i suggest you catch up on the latest xx/dy news. your beloved idol plagarised from a lot of people. INCLUDING OUR PM. doesn't fart rainbows and sunshine anymore now, does she? _|_Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-10855101834754433822008-07-26T12:36:00.000-07:002008-07-26T12:36:00.000-07:00How come no one realized that Dawn Yang has offend...How come no one realized that Dawn Yang has offended some serious gangsters from HK with her posts in asianfanatics?<BR/><BR/>Does she wanna end up like Carina Lau or what?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-39698450665675665972008-07-26T09:43:00.000-07:002008-07-26T09:43:00.000-07:00Dawn Wayang's site is NOT cyber bullying (even if ...Dawn Wayang's site is NOT cyber bullying (even if TOSses argue). It's an anti-site for a blogebrity. If and when Dawn decides that she no longer wants to be an Internet celebrity, the negative attention will stop. And everything here is posted as a response to things she has done as part of her public persona (her saintly image, her physical appearance, etc.).<BR/><BR/>I've seen real cyber-bullying in action. It's way more vicious than this. If you think this is bad, check out some of the communities on Livejournal. Check out Encyclopedia Dramatica. Check out some of the antics people on 4chan's /b/ board can get into. <BR/><BR/>I've seen home addresses posted into public and (false) death threats sent for some laughs and intimidation. Saying that Dawn Wayang's site is anything close to these cases is a total mockery and insult to the gravity of cyber bullying. <BR/><BR/>I'm sorry Emm, but I feel strongly about cyber bullying and that is why I object to you. Making the comparison between a blogebrity's anti-site and the kind of stalking and harassment that cyber bullying involves belittles the victims of cyber bullying.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-22025884375193119622008-07-25T23:55:00.000-07:002008-07-25T23:55:00.000-07:00@ BelleYou're partially right about the blog promo...@ Belle<BR/>You're partially right about the blog promotion thing, BUT if I hadn't come across this site, I would not have started a blog of my own. <BR/><BR/>My rational is that this is not the only case of bullying, and if this site gets taken down (again) I will have to start my anti-bullying campaign all over again (again)... <BR/><BR/>@cynical<BR/>I'm not trying to uphold DY's innocence. I'm just trying to do the right thing (i.e. stop bullying).EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-35423252661552856822008-07-25T20:21:00.000-07:002008-07-25T20:21:00.000-07:00The reason EmmZen is being such a hero upholding D...The reason EmmZen is being such a hero upholding DY's so called innocense..is because..like every others.<BR/><BR/><BR/>" He has spread DY's dutch legs. "<BR/><BR/><BR/>wtf la you.EmmZen.<BR/>You may not like it here at DW.com, don't come in then!<BR/><BR/>i think like what Belle say is true. Farkin Spammer!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-79628297938669327092008-07-25T19:58:00.000-07:002008-07-25T19:58:00.000-07:00emmzen spent so much precious time replying and co...emmzen spent so much precious time replying and counter comment one by one. salute! but its dumb la..at the end of the day you just wanna promote your blog. sianBellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09599886739896177740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-18484259026029808272008-07-25T09:46:00.000-07:002008-07-25T09:46:00.000-07:00As I promised DW first dibs on reading what I want...As I promised DW first dibs on reading what I wanted to say I decided to hold-off for 24hrs before I said my point in my first blog post.If you want, feel free to read it at http://emmsthoughtmill.blogspot.com/EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-64071796040064595882008-07-24T09:02:00.000-07:002008-07-24T09:02:00.000-07:00Sorry I've been MIA. An emergency cropped up and I...Sorry I've been MIA. An emergency cropped up and I had no time to follow-up on anything till today. I've emailed DW to explain the delay.<BR/><BR/>@swd<BR/>As I said it was a hypothetical about the an alter-ego blog for XX as well as the SPG bit. <BR/><BR/>Rest assured if I find out about such a blog, I'll be just as vocal about it as I am about DW's.<BR/><BR/>I do know what an SPG is. What I'm inferring is that someone could easily say just that, just like people are saying that DY slept with Mr R from pics of them in public???<BR/><BR/>Sorry, but I have to disagree with you that there are justified reasons for bullying. Two wrongs (this is assuming that everything said about DY is true) do not make a right.<BR/><BR/>Btw, if you had read the emails XX posted. DY wanted to settle the matter amicably with just the post taken down and with a sincere apology highlighting what was wrong. Of course XX would not apologise properly, but DY decided to just be nice and forget it (as per her blog). It was XX that decided to launch the next round of attacks so DY retracted her truce offering. What else could DY do other than to seek proper legal action then??<BR/><BR/>@skaterzboo<BR/>The fact that you find nothing wrong with this site and are contributing to the attack shows that not only do you not understand the concept of bullying, but also that you are a bully as much as DW, Stella, etc are.<BR/><BR/>Do you know DY personally to be able to call her plastic??? What money are you talking about??? Ad money??? I doubt XX and DY would be paid on a per click basis, so this additional traffic would mean nothing to them. Or are you talking about damages if she wins the lawsuit?? How do you know if she's only going to ask for enough to just cover the legal fees or not??? <BR/><BR/>I would also suggest you not assume that others spread their legs as easily as you might. <BR/><BR/>Also considering how you're writing, I doubt you can call anyone else a b|tch at this point in time.<BR/><BR/>Oh and god helps those who help themselves.<BR/><BR/>One last thing. I suggest you read before you type as DY did NOT say she's dutch/thai. The FHM article said her GRANDPARENTS had dutch/thai blood (I discovered this thanks to Stella's blog).<BR/><BR/>@ anonymous (the two that heard about DY wanting to sue)<BR/>You're both not wrong. However considering XX did not want to apologise, I can't see any other action that DY could have taken.<BR/><BR/>@ anonymous (the juvenile one that tried to insult me).<BR/>Actually me calling DW a bully is perfectly justified. This behaviour is classified as bullying. Go read some psych journals if you want to find out more.EmmZenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036174654459880931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-58417956400188986492008-07-22T11:52:00.000-07:002008-07-22T11:52:00.000-07:00@nybluedog: i agree wholeheartedly with what you s...@nybluedog: i agree wholeheartedly with what you said. yes, dawn may be blowing things terribly out of proportion with her lawsuit, faking about her plastic surgery, or whatever. <BR/><BR/>but who are we to put ourselves on a pedestal and judge her? much less in such a cruel fashion, and anonymously. my question is: what exactly are we hoping to achieve from this?<BR/><BR/>also, about this blog owner having talent, being very methodical and incredibly resourceful - i agree too, and props to that. i will not deny that i find this blog very juicy and interesting. but being juicy doesn't mean that it is right, and being interesting doesn't mean that it is moral. please blog writer, i sincerely hope you utilize your talent in a greater way. :)<BR/><BR/><BR/>n.b: i am in no way a supporter of dawn yang. just a neutral observer with my two cents worth.<BR/><BR/><BR/>- CAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-35555907191813434062008-07-22T09:52:00.000-07:002008-07-22T09:52:00.000-07:00@ skaterzbooyou could try trudging through DY's ar...@ skaterzboo<BR/><BR/>you could try trudging through DY's archives. :/ DW had it in the Xanga site but, as you know, it's been shut down by that hypocrite.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-69864832116948711232008-07-22T04:13:00.000-07:002008-07-22T04:13:00.000-07:00Btw eh, I don't really read up on diz faker DY til...Btw eh, I don't really read up on diz faker DY till diz war began between XX and her. Where can I find the article dat she claims she'sa dutch thai? Pelease she is obviously a Cina. She's not paisey meh to make such a claim? <BR/><BR/>Why must she deny her own ethnics in the first place anyway?<BR/><BR/>I'm a malay and I AM DAMN PROUD TO BE ONE.<BR/><BR/>WTF!SkaterzBoohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04550622284340452952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-59181650318876491362008-07-22T01:10:00.000-07:002008-07-22T01:10:00.000-07:00EmmZen is honestly very brainless. So much to defe...EmmZen is honestly very brainless. So much to defend yourself. Then please don't read this blog. <BR/><BR/>Is the fact, that *itch got alot of things to talk about. She's a hypocrite and an evil witch in disguise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-37269006234697094492008-07-22T01:05:00.000-07:002008-07-22T01:05:00.000-07:00yes yes yes. I also heard that too from a reliable...yes yes yes. I also heard that too from a reliable source that Dawn Y is the one who wants to sue XX. She's a bit**. I think the company wants to save their reputation and not mingle on this kind of problem to create bigger problems.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3314425838005411776.post-24105349507352060412008-07-21T18:12:00.000-07:002008-07-21T18:12:00.000-07:00Yeap...and i also heard from a very reliable sourc...Yeap...<BR/><BR/>and i also heard from a very reliable source that its not looque and dawn's manager who wants to xx, in fact they told her to drop the lawsuit. Its the scheming poisonous slut herself who wants to sue XX. so who's the bigger bully?<BR/><BR/>know your facts before saying anything, emmanure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com